胡小锋,刘卫东,周帅.电晕放电辐射信号的特征提取和模式识别方法研究[J].装备环境工程,2017,14(4):57-61. HU Xiao-feng,LIU Wei-dong,ZHOU Shuai.Feature Extraction and Pattern Recognition of Corona Discharging Signals[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2017,14(4):57-61.
电晕放电辐射信号的特征提取和模式识别方法研究
Feature Extraction and Pattern Recognition of Corona Discharging Signals
投稿时间:2017-01-18  修订日期:2017-04-15
DOI:10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2017.04.012
中文关键词:  电晕放电  特征提取  模式识别  概率神经网络
英文关键词:corona discharging  feature extraction  pattern recognition  probabilistic neural network
基金项目:
作者单位
胡小锋 军械工程学院 静电与电磁防护研究所,石家庄 050003 
刘卫东 军械工程学院 静电与电磁防护研究所,石家庄 050003 
周帅 军械工程学院 静电与电磁防护研究所,石家庄 050003 
AuthorInstitution
HU Xiao-feng Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection, Machine Engineering College, Shijiazhuang 050003, China 
LIU Wei-dong Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection, Machine Engineering College, Shijiazhuang 050003, China 
ZHOU Shuai Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection, Machine Engineering College, Shijiazhuang 050003, China 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 研究电晕放电辐射信号的特征提取和模式识别方法。方法 在分析信号特征提取方法的基础上,对实测的电晕放电辐射信号特征提取,利用概率神经网络开展电晕放电辐射信号目标识别,检验特征提取的有效性。结果 以奇异值作为输入特征量的PNN在整体上效果更优,稳定性好,对两类不同放电辐射信号的正确识别率均可达到80%以上,并且当输入特征量个数达到10个时,对实测样本的正确识别率均达到了最高值。电晕放电的正确识别率为96.7%,火花放电的正确识别率为93.3%。结论 该方法能基本满足实际放电信号的识别应用。
英文摘要:
      Objective To research methods for feature extraction and pattern recognition of corona discharge radiation signals. Methods Based on the analysis of signal feature extraction method, the signal feature of corona discharge radiation measured was extracted. The probabilistic neural network was adopted to identify corona discharge radiation signal target to test the effectiveness of the proposed feature extraction. Results The PNN with singular value as the input characteristics was overall better in effect and good in stability. Its correct rate of recognition of two kinds of different discharge radiation signals could be higher than 80%. When ten characteristics were input, the correct recognition rate reached the peak of the measured samples. The correct recognition rate of corona discharge was 96.7%. The correct recognition rate of spark discharge was 93.3%. Conclusion This method can basically meet the recognition and application of actual discharge signals.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第12765942位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-5

版权所有:《装备环境工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039     电话:023-68792835    Email: zbhjgc@163.com

视频号 公众号