亓云飞.海水管道内壁外加电流系统棒状辅助阳极保护距离探讨[J].装备环境工程,2017,14(6):33-37. QI Yun-fei.Protection Distance of Impressed Current System Rod-shaped Auxiliary Anode in Seawater Pipe[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2017,14(6):33-37.
海水管道内壁外加电流系统棒状辅助阳极保护距离探讨
Protection Distance of Impressed Current System Rod-shaped Auxiliary Anode in Seawater Pipe
投稿时间:2017-03-13  修订日期:2017-06-15
DOI:10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2017.06.008
中文关键词:  海水管道  外加电流系统  棒状辅助阳极  保护距离
英文关键词:seawater pipe  impressed current system  rod-shaped auxiliary anode  protection distance
基金项目:
作者单位
亓云飞 1.青岛钢研纳克检测防护技术有限公司,山东 青岛 266071;2.钢铁研究总院 青岛海洋腐蚀研究所,山东 青岛 266071 
AuthorInstitution
QI Yun-fei 1.Qingdao NCS Testing & Corrosion Protection Technology Co., Ltd, Qingdao 266071, China;2.Qingdao Research Institute for Marine Corrosion, Qingdao 266071, China 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 研究不同管径海水管道在静态及不同海水流速环境中外加电流系统棒状辅助阳极对管道内部腐蚀防护的规律。方法 模拟海水管道实海环境,对管道施加棒状辅助阳极外加电流阴极保护,连续测定管道不同部位保护电位,由此得到防护规律。结果 静态试验中,随管径变小,最大保护距离越短,当管径直径≤100 mm时,棒状辅助阳极基本起不到保护作用,不适宜用此种方法保护。动态试验中,同一管径的管道,流速越大,保护效果越差,但影响不大,流速在2~4 m/s之间保护距离差异不大;不同管径,仍如静态实验结果相似,随管径变小,保护距离越短。结论 棒状辅助阳极在海水管道中的保护距离有限,且不适合小管径管道,要想提供管道长距离稳定的保护效果需考虑其他方式。
英文摘要:
      Objective To study corrosion protection rules of impressed current system bar-shaped auxiliary anode in different diameter seawater pipes based on the static and dynamic environments. Methods The marine environment of seawater pipes were simulated, the seawater pipe was protected with rod-shaped auxiliary anode and cathode and the protection potential on different position of the pipe was measured to obtain the rules of corrosion protection. Results In static test, the smaller the diameter, the shorter the maximum protection distance. When the pipe diameter was less than or equal to 100 mm, the rod-shaped anode almost did not work. This protection method was unsuitable. In dynamic test, in case the pipes of the same diameter, the greater the flow velocity, the worse the protection effect. But the influence was not significant. There was little different in protection distance when the flow velocity was between 2 m/s and 4m/s; in case of different pipe diameter, the result was also similar to that of static test. The smaller the diameter, the shorter the protection distance. Conclusion The protection distance of rod-shaped auxiliary anode is limited, and it is unsuitable for small diameter pipes. It needs to consider other ways to provide uniform protection effect of long distance for pipe.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第12770213位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-5

版权所有:《装备环境工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039     电话:023-68792835    Email: zbhjgc@163.com

视频号 公众号