郝二通,王未,王铭.海上风电机组单桩基础和三脚架基础抗撞性能研究[J].装备环境工程,2020,17(7):6-11. HAO Er-tong,WANG Wei,WANG Ming.Anti-impact Performance of Offshore Wind Turbine with Monopile and Tripod Foundations[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2020,17(7):6-11.
海上风电机组单桩基础和三脚架基础抗撞性能研究
Anti-impact Performance of Offshore Wind Turbine with Monopile and Tripod Foundations
投稿时间:2020-05-18  修订日期:2020-06-10
DOI:10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2020.07.002
中文关键词:  海上风电机组  单桩基础  三脚架基础  基础损伤  机组响应
英文关键词:offshore wind turbine  monopile foundation  tripod foundation  foundation damage  unit response
基金项目:
作者单位
郝二通 北京万源工业有限公司,北京 100176 
王未 中国运载火箭技术研究院 国际业务部,北京 100076 
王铭 北京万源工业有限公司,北京 100176 
AuthorInstitution
HAO Er-tong Beijing Wanyuan Industrial Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China 
WANG Wei International Business Department, China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, Beijing 100076, China 
WANG Ming Beijing Wanyuan Industrial Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 评估海上风电机组单桩基础和三脚架基础遭遇船舶撞击时的抗撞性能。方法 针对上述两种基础,采用LS-DYNA软件分析不同碰撞工况下的最大碰撞力、基础受损面积、机舱加速度最大值及基础钢材消耗量,获取两类基础的基础损伤程度和机组响应幅度。结果 单桩基础受损程度低于三脚架基础约22%,三脚架基础机舱响应值低于单桩基础约32%。结论 两类基础抗撞性能满足规范要求,未发生因基础失效引起的倒塔事故,机头不存在脱落风险,单桩基础在基础损伤方面表现更好,而三脚架基础在机组机舱响应方面表现更好。
英文摘要:
      This study is devoted to evaluate the anti-impact performance of offshore wind turbines (OWTs)’ monopole and tripod foundations subject to ship impacts. Contraposing to the above two foundations, software LS-DYNA was adopted to analyze the maximum collision-force, the damage area, the maximum nacelle acceleration and the steel consumption under different impact conditions to obtain the foundation damage and the OWT response of the two types of foundations. The results showed that the damage of monopole foundation was about 22% lower than that of tripod foundation; the nacelle response of tripod foundation was about 32% lower than that of monopile foundation. It is concluded that there is no risk of tower collapse accident caused by foundation failure and no risk of nacelle falling off for two types of foundations meeting the anti-collision performance requirements of the specification. Meanwhile, the damage of monopile is lighter than that of tripod, the nacelle response of tripod is better than that of monopile.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第12773115位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-5

版权所有:《装备环境工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039     电话:023-68792835    Email: zbhjgc@163.com

视频号 公众号