张生鹏,倪瑞政,徐如远,马小兵,李宏民.基于相对熵权重组合的多阶段贮存数据融合评估方法[J].装备环境工程,2024,21(7):1-8. ZHANG Shengpeng,NI Ruizheng,XU Ruyuan,MA Xiaobing,LI Hongmin.A Multi-stage Storage Data Fusion Evaluation Method Based on Relative Entropy Weight Combination[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2024,21(7):1-8.
基于相对熵权重组合的多阶段贮存数据融合评估方法
A Multi-stage Storage Data Fusion Evaluation Method Based on Relative Entropy Weight Combination
投稿时间:2024-06-24  修订日期:2024-07-11
DOI:10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2024.07.001
中文关键词:  贮存数据  加速贮存数据  多源信息  相对熵  权重计算  融合评估中图分类号:TJ760.89 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1672-9242(2024)07-0001-08
英文关键词:storage data  acceleration data  multi source information  relative entropy  weight calculation  fusion evaluation
基金项目:装备预先研究共用技术(50904060202)
作者单位
张生鹏 北京航空航天大学,北京 100191;航天科工防御技术研究试验中心,北京 100854 
倪瑞政 航天科工防御技术研究试验中心,北京 100854 
徐如远 航天科工防御技术研究试验中心,北京 100854 
马小兵 北京航空航天大学,北京 100191 
李宏民 北京航空航天大学,北京 100191;航天科工防御技术研究试验中心,北京 100854 
AuthorInstitution
ZHANG Shengpeng Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China;Aerospace Science and Technology Defense Technology Research and Experiment Center, Beijing 100854, China 
NI Ruizheng Aerospace Science and Technology Defense Technology Research and Experiment Center, Beijing 100854, China 
XU Ruyuan Aerospace Science and Technology Defense Technology Research and Experiment Center, Beijing 100854, China 
MA Xiaobing Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China 
LI Hongmin Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China;Aerospace Science and Technology Defense Technology Research and Experiment Center, Beijing 100854, China 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 针对目前仅使用加速贮存数据获取产品性能参数退化信息导致贮存寿命评估可信度低的问题,融合自然贮存数据和加速贮存数据2阶段的数据结果。方法 采用基于最小二乘和相对熵的方法,确定不同阶段数据的权重比例,最后形成融合2阶段数据的评估方法,并在扭杆和控制放大器2个产品上进行自然贮存数据与加速贮存数据的融合分析。结果 实现了2个产品贮存寿命的高置信度评估,扭杆自然贮存数据和加速贮存数据的权重比例分别为0.263和0.737,控制放大器自然贮存数据和加速贮存数据的权重比例分别为0.776和0.224。结论 融合评价的方法能够结合2部分数据的退化特点,给出一个更有信服力的评价结果。
英文摘要:
      The equipment has been stored in a natural environment for certain years before the accelerated storage test. Its usage and detection information during different stages has different characteristics, and has irreplaceable value in determining the health status of the equipment. Natural storage data has high credibility but lacks data, while laboratory accelerated storage data has rich information but low credibility. This article aims to address the issue of low reliability in evaluating storage life due to the use of only accelerated storage data to obtain degradation information of product performance parameters. The results of natural storage data and accelerated storage data from two stages were integrated. The methods based on least squares and relative entropy were used to determine the weight ratios of data from different stages. Finally, an evaluation method that integrated two-stage data was formed. By conducting fusion analysis of natural storage data and accelerated storage data on the torsion bar and control amplifier products, a high confidence evaluation of the storage life of the two products was achieved. The weight ratios of natural storage data and accelerated storage data on the torsion bar were 0.263 and 0.737, respectively. The weight ratios of natural storage data and accelerated storage data on the control amplifier were 0.776 and 0.224, respectively. The data results show that the fusion evaluation method can combine the degradation characteristics of the two parts of the data to provide a more convincing evaluation result.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第12769993位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-5

版权所有:《装备环境工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039     电话:023-68792835    Email: zbhjgc@163.com

视频号 公众号