Catapult Launch and Arrested Landing Shock Test Methods
Received:February 22, 2020  Revised:March 30, 2020
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
DOI:10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2020.04.008
KeyWord:catapult launch  arrested landing  shock  environmental test
                             
AuthorInstitution
MAO Yong-jian Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
WANG Jue Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
CHEN Ying Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
LIU Qing-lin Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
LI Ming-hai Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
NIU Bao-liang Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
ZHANG Ping Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
YAN Xia Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
ZHENG Min Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
LI Xiao-lin Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang , China
Hits:
Download times:
Abstract:
      The paper aims to study the engineering implementation methods for catapult launch and arrested landing shock tests of materiel mounted in or on carrier-based aircraft. Based on GJB 150.18A—2009, MIL-STD-810F/G and the presented measured data, the characteristics of catapult launch and arrested landing shock were analyzed and the present test methods were discussed and compared. The catapult launch and arrested landing shock loads were transient, alternate, in low-frequency, of large displacement and high velocity. The implementation approach of the damped sine wave method was relatively clear; while the complex wave form control method was unclear and complicated. And there were several disadvantages in the super-long-duration half-sine wave method. The velocity and displacement were relatively large in the damped sine wave method and the complex wave form control method.The damped sine wave method is more convenient to be implemented than the complex wave form control method; and for the both methods, special large-displacement and high-velocity shock machines and appropriate waveform processing techniques are necessary; the super-long-duration half-sine wave method should not be recommended when one of the above two standard-recommended methods is available.
Close