|
| Measurement and Comparison of Cathodic Protection Potential of Different Sacrificial Anode Material |
| Received:November 05, 2010 Revised:June 15, 2011 |
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| DOI： |
| KeyWord:body potential sacrificial anode polarization rapidity |
| Author | Institution |
| HUANG Yan-bin |
Department of Equipment Remanufacture Engineering，Academy of Armored Force Engineering，Beijing ，China |
| SONG Gao-wei |
Department of Equipment Remanufacture Engineering，Academy of Armored Force Engineering，Beijing ，China |
| DING Hua-dong |
Department of Equipment Remanufacture Engineering，Academy of Armored Force Engineering，Beijing ，China |
| LIU Xue-bin |
Department of Equipment Remanufacture Engineering，Academy of Armored Force Engineering，Beijing ，China |
| BIAN Fei-long |
Department of Equipment Remanufacture Engineering，Academy of Armored Force Engineering，Beijing ，China |
|
| Hits: |
| Download times: |
| Abstract: |
| Body potential of amphibian vehicle with different sacrificial anode material was measured with continuous measure method. It was proved by measuring data that quinary and hexahydroxy alloy anode both cannot provide enough protection potential for amphibian vehicle; the polarization rapidity of quinary alloy anode is slower than hexahydroxy one; The hexahydroxy anode is suited for amphibian vehicles better. |
| Close |