Corrosion Morphology Identification of Typical Materials in Xisha Marine Atmospheric Environment
Received:February 27, 2019  Revised:July 25, 2019
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
DOI:10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2019.07.001
KeyWord:Xisha  marine atmosphere  corrosion  image processing  percentage of corrosion area
                    
AuthorInstitution
PENG Wen-shan State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
HOU Jian State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
GUO Wei-min State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
DING Kang-kang State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
ZHANG Peng-hui State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
CHENG Wen-hua State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
SUN Ming-xian State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao , China
Hits:
Download times:
Abstract:
      Objective To obtain the surface corrosion morphology parameters of typical materials in Xisha marine atmospheric environment, and analyze the corrosion regularities. Methods The corrosion morphology and corrosion law of 5052 aluminum al-loy, 304 stainless steel and EH36 low alloy steel in Xisha marine atmospheric environment were studied through outdoor exposure tests. The digital image processing method was used to analyze the corrosion characteristics of the sample surface. Results The atmospheric corrosion morphology of EH36 steel was mainly uniform corrosion and corrosion pits; while that of 5052 aluminum alloy and 304 stainless steel was mainly pitting corrosion. The corrosion rate of EH36 low alloy steel was significantly higher than that of 5052 aluminum alloy and 304 stainless steel. The change regularity of the percentage of corrosion area of these three typical materials was the same as the change regularity of the percentage of pits area. The change regularity of the percentage of corrosion area and the percentage of pits area of 5052 aluminum alloy and EH36 low alloy steel were consistent with the change of their cor-rosion rate; while the percentage of corrosion area and the percentage of pits area of 304 stainless steel were opposite to the change of its corrosion rate. For 5052 aluminum alloy and EH36 low alloy steel, the number of corrosion pits of the one-year period specimen was greater than that of the two-year period specimen. For 304 stainless steel, the number of corrosion pits of the one-year period specimen was not much different from that of the two-year period specimen. Conclusion The corrosion rate, cor-rosion area percentage, and percentage of pits area of these three typical materials in Xisha atmospheric environment are all signifi-cantly different. For the same material, the percentage of corrosion area, the percentage of pits area and the number of pits on the front side are quite different from those on the back side of the specimen.
Close