|
| Method for High-consequence Area Identification and Integrity Evaluation of Oil and Gas Pipelines in Service |
| Received:July 30, 2019 Revised:August 18, 2019 |
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| DOI：10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2020.01.018 |
| KeyWord:pipeline in service integrity management high-consequence area identification risk evaluation direct evaluation fit for service |
| Author | Institution |
| YANG Chun-lin |
Research Institute of Oil and Gas Engineering, Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla , China |
| YUAN Jing-qing |
Research Institute of Oil and Gas Engineering, Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla , China |
| ZHANG Ai-liang |
Research Institute of Oil and Gas Engineering, Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla , China |
| GONG Yan-shuang |
Research Institute of Oil and Gas Engineering, Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla , China |
| HAO Xiao-dong |
PetroChina Planning and Engineering Institute, Beijing , China |
| YANG Yun-cheng |
Research Institute of Oil and Gas Engineering, Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla , China |
|
| Hits: |
| Download times: |
| Abstract: |
| According to relevant standards and norms or guidelines on construction and management of oil and gas pipelines, the classification of high-consequence areas and their differences in different standards, as well as the principles and time intervals for identification, were presented for the current pipelines in oil and gas fields. Methods for evaluating pipeline risks caused by geological disasters and third-party damage on the basis of relevant data collection of pipelines, direct evaluation of internal and external corrosion of pipelines, and fitness-for-service evaluation of pipeline applicability including residual strength, remaining life and materials were introduced and relevant content items involved in these evaluation work were given. They have important guiding role and application value for integrity management of oil field pipelines. |
| Close |
|
|
|